June 15, 2012

Top 14 Chess Books for Beginners/Novices

kurtgodden

We play chess because it seduces our intellect, is an analogue to life itself, and represents the ever-elusive quest for mental and emotional elegance.

At least that’s why I play chess. You might just play it because you enjoy beating the hell out of some loser. In any case, we share the desire to improve our game.

The best way to learn something is to get battered by doing it wrong, then do it again with the wisdom of your bruises. (The second best way to learn something is to teach it, by the way. ) But the best way to learn is not necessarily the most efficient, and I personally don’t have enough time left on this earth to imbibe the complexities of chess by self-discovery. So I have opted for the most efficient way, which is a combination of study and over-the-board play. The first is science, and the second engineering.

I will preface this column by saying that I have read (or am in the process of reading, as noted) all of the books on this list. I will present them in the order that I wish I had read them, since some would have prepared me to understand others more effectively. So let’s get to the list, and I’ll explain the reasons for these choices as we go along.

1. “Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess” by, strangely enough, Bobby Fischer, the first and only official American World Chess Champion, co-authored by S. Margulies and D. Mosenfelder. This is a good beginners book and spends most of its time on the end game, rather than the opening or the middle game. This may seem odd, but many people advocate learning the end game first. BFTC will introduce you to the basic patterns of mating, and, as if by educational osmosis, it will also begin to instill a sense of tactics into your game. The book is a bit odd since it uses what is called ‘programmed instruction’, rather than a normal prose book. While programmed instruction is not found much these days, it remains a fine instructional format. Bantam Books, 1972. You can find it in all bookstores in the games section.


2. “Pandolfini’s Ultimate Guide to Chess” by Bruce Pandolfini, the personal trainer of Josh Waitzkin, the child chess prodigy and subject of the wonderful chess film “Searching for Bobby Fischer”, after the book by the same name. (Read that too, by the way, just for fun.) PUGtC is written as a hypothetical dialogue between a student and a chess instructor, and covers a single game, move by move with the omniscient teacher explaining a multitude of chess concepts to the beginning patzer. It includes some fun appendices. The one highly irritating thing about this book for me is the fact that they never conclude to an emotionally satisfying mate the game that covers 23 moves in over 300 pages! Fireside Books, 2003.


3. “Logical Chess: Move by Move” by Irving Chernev. Chernev is, in my oh-so-humble opinion, the best of the classic chess authors of the 20th century. There is a new edition of this text in algebraic notation. Make sure you get that edition so you don’t suffer the annoying English descriptive notation that I had to endure in the 1957 edition by Simon & Schuster. Chernev walks you through 33 complete actual master-level games and explains every single move in every single game. Ever feel baffled by some non-descript pawn move in a master game you’ve looked at? Chernev will clarify the mystery for you.


4. Now that you’ve had some exposure to basic ideas, you are ready to expand your chess knowledge. I recommend another book by B. Pandolfini called “Weapons of Chess”, which is organized alphabetically and will introduce you to important concepts like bad bishops, pawn structure, passed pawns, positional play, and so forth. Fireside, 1989.


5. With the previous book you will be in a good position to better understand the wondrous teachings of the best contemporary chess author (at least for beginners/novices) – Jeremy Silman. His clever book “The Amateur’s Mind” explores actual remarks from his own beginning students about a position and their choice of move, going on to explain where their errors are. Chances are, you will make similar errors, and Silman will sound as if he is speaking to you. You will get introduced to Silman’s important notion of imbalances, and the importance of understanding imbalances. 2nd edition, Siles Press, 1999.


6. Now you will be ready for some fun, by which I mean tactics! With tactics you will begin to appreciate the creativity of a good player, and with a basic knowledge of tactics you can understand when it is beneficial to sacrifice your pieces and come out ahead! There are lots of good texts on tactics, generally written by acknowledged chess masters. One such text is the classic “Winning Chess” by Chernev and Fred Reinfeld. I read an old, yellowing copy published in 1948 by Simon & Schuster, but you can still get it new at Amazon. Puzzle books are also mainly tactical in nature, and an old classic that you can still pick up in bookstores is “1001 Winning Chess Sacrifices and Combinations” by Fred Reinfeld (same guy as previous book). Sterling [my middle name] Publishing, 1955. I’m still in the process of going through these puzzles. Some are easy, and some are damned hard. However, as good as these books are, the BEST BOOK on tactics was NOT written by a master. I am referring to “Predator at the Chess Board: a Field Guide to Chess Tactics” by Ward Farnsworth, a law professor at Boston University. It is available in two volumes (http://www.lulu.com/content/632810) or you can access it online in HTML format at http://www.chesstactics.org/.  It is very long, but there is a diagram for every page, and it is extraordinarily easy to read. I love this book. It should be on everyone’s list.


7. If you liked the Silman book recommended above (#5), you will swear by his other book “How to Reassess Your Chess”. This is a magnificent middle-game book and will go into much more depth on the topics introduced by book #4 with much insightful commentary. Silman goes into his ideas of imbalances in great detail here, but it is surprisingly easy to read. 3rd edition, Siles Press, 1993.


8. Next is a book I’m currently reading, but I wish I had discovered earlier. It is “How to Choose a Chess Move” by Andrew Soltis. Don’t look for an algorithm that you can follow, but do look for sound advice that will ring true to the concepts you’ve read about in Silman and others. Batsford, 2005.


9. If you’ve made it this far, then you are already a serious student of chess. I congratulate you and offer my condolences to your significant other. My next recommendation is the classic “My System” by Aron Nimzowitsch. Make sure you get the so-called “21st Century Edition”, which was actually published by Hays in the 20th century. Go figure. Since1925, this book has been the classic reference for positional play, a concept that revolutionized chess thinking over the past century or so. It is still easily accessible to the beginner/novice and will give you more depth on some topics covered by Silman, such as overprotection and isolated d-pawns.


10. And speaking of Silman (I just was), the next book is yet another of his. “The Complete Book of Chess Strategy”, Siles Press, 1998, is another text organized alphabetically within four organizing sections that cover the Opening, the Middle Game, the End Game and a final section on Practical Matters that discusses tournament play. The openings section covers no less than 45 different openings, albeit in abbreviated form. Don’t try to memorize these. You are smarter than that. Work your way through them, and try to internalize the concepts in the light of your previous studies. Then when you encounter them in your games, you’ll be equipped to reason your way through them, even if you don’t have them memorized.


11. By this point you have read 10 fine texts, and have laid the groundwork for more advanced study. But first, why not another classic by Irving Chernev? “The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever Played” is another one of those books that I’m currently reading, and which explains every move of 62 highly instructive games. Why he chose 62 games and not 64 is one of the great, unsolved mysteries of chess literature. Published by Dover in 1965, but I think there’s a newer version in algebraic format that would be easier to read. If you search, you can find all 62 games on the web. Just download them and view in your favorite chess game engine as you read.


12. Once you are at this point in your chess studies, you are probably actually making it to the endgame, as opposed to getting mated in the middle game, or even (embarrassing though it may be) the opening. So you need to firm up your end game knowledge, and for this there are many good books. I recently saw a new endgame book by Silman, which I expect is quite good, but I have not read it. I am in the middle of studying “Pandolfini’s Endgame Course”, mainly during my lunch breaks since each little mini-lesson occupies just a single page and can be digested concurrently with my sandwich. You really do need to understand the diagonal of the pawn, the notion of kingly opposition and the Lucena position if you want to beat the other woodpushers at the club. Fireside Chess, 1988.


13. The book I recommend for the lucky 13th spot is no less than the highly-regarded reference “Modern Chess Openings”, 14th edition, commonly referred to as MCO-14 by Nick de Firmian. If you are old enough, you had better take a double shot of bourbon before opening it up at the local Borders bookstore because it is not for the faint of heart. It consists of over 700 pages densely packed with hundreds of tables of openings variations with almost no commentary. Just lists of moves. To be more precise, I have counted and/or estimated that MCO-14 contains no less than 265 tables, containing about 1,590 opening variations of perhaps a dozen moves each (for each side), or roughly 30,000 individual moves in total. And if that weren’t enough, each of the 265 tables contains a page or more of dense footnotes to the variations that list additional lines of play. As I said, make the bourbon a double before you crack this tome open. I once read a biography of Bobby Fischer, who remarked, in response to a question about what he would teach a student if he were ever to give chess lessons, that for the first lesson he would tell his student to study every variation of every opening in MCO, including footnotes. And for lesson two he would tell them to repeat the exercise. After the initial impulse to laugh, I could only admire him for that response, because I realized that, in all likelihood, he had done exactly that himself. MCO-14, McKay Chess Library, 1999.


14. After you finish learning MCO and are ready for some lighter fare, go track down a copy of “The Oxford Companion to Chess” by David Hooper and Kenneth Whyld, if you can find it. Published by Oxford University Press in 1984, this is a marvelous reference work, and includes brief biographies of all the great chess masters, summaries of openings, history of the game, descriptions of chess variants, origins of the moves, and all manner of esoterica, such as the estimate that there are more distinct 40-move games of chess (25 x 10^115) than there are electrons in the universe (10^79). Enjoy the book while relaxing with a bourbon. You earned it.

Addendum added on Dec 7, 2007: A good friend of mine (who's MUCH better than me, also mentioned that a very good series of books for beginners is the group of "Winning Chess" books written by Yasser Seirawan. I have not read them, but I have heard that they are very good from others, too. I see that I'm starting to get several people reading this blog, so please let me know if you have any requests for topics. I'm not an expert, but I do have a lot to say to beginners and novices. -KG
©

Earthquake Survival Instructions: Triangle of life

My name is Doug Copp. I am the Rescue Chief and Disaster Manager of the American Rescue Team International (ARTI), the world's most experienced rescue team. The information in this article will save lives in an earthquake.

I have crawled inside 875 collapsed buildings, worked with rescue teams from 60 countries, founded rescue teams in several countries, and I am a member of many rescue teams from many countries.

I was the United Nations expert in Disaster Mitigation for two years. I have worked at every major disaster in the world since 1985, except for simultaneous disasters.

The first building I ever crawled inside of was a school in Mexico City during the 1985 earthquake. Every child was under its desk. Every child was crushed to the thickness of their bones. They could have survived by lying down next to their desks in the aisles. It was obscene, unnecessary and I wondered why the children were not in the aisles. I didn't at the time know that the children were told to hide under something. I am amazed that even today schools are still using the ?Duck and Cover? instructions- telling the children to squat under their desks with their heads bowed and covered with
their hands. This was the technique used in the Mexico City school.

Simply stated, when buildings collapse, the weight of the ceilings falling upon the objects or furniture inside crushes these objects, leaving a space or void next to them. This space is what I call the 'triangle of life'. The larger the object, the stronger, the less it will compact. The less the object compacts, the larger the void, the greater the probability that the person who is using this void for safety will not be injured. The next time you watch collapsed buildings, on television, count the 'triangles' you see formed. They are everywhere. It is the most common shape, you will see, in a collapsed building.

TIPS FOR EARTHQUAKE SAFETY

1) Almost everyone who simply 'ducks and covers' when buildings collapse ARE CRUSHED TO DEATH. People who get under objects, like desks or cars, are crushed.



2) Cats, dogs and babies often naturally curl up in the fetal position. You should too in an earthquake. It is a natural safety/survival instinct. That position helps you survive in a smaller void. Get next to an object, next to a sofa, next to a large bulky object that will compress slightly but leave a void next to it.

3) Wooden buildings are the safest type of construction to be in during an earthquake. Wood is flexible and moves with the force of the earthquake. If the wooden building does collapse, large survival voids are created. Also, the wooden building has less concentrated, crushing weight. Brick buildings will break into individual bricks. Bricks will cause many injuries but less squashed bodies than concrete slabs. Concrete slab buildings are the most dangerous during an earthquake.

4) If you are in bed during the night and an earthquake occurs, simply roll off the bed. A safe void will exist around the bed. Hotels can achieve a much greater survival rate in earthquakes, simply by posting a sign on the back of the door of every room telling occupants to lie down on the floor, next to the bottom of the bed during an earthquake.





5) If an earthquake happens and you cannot easily escape by getting out the door or window, then lie down and curl up in the fetal position next to a sofa, or large chair.



6) Almost everyone who gets under a doorway when buildings collapse is killed. How? If you stand under a doorwa y and the doorjamb falls forward or backward you will be crushed by the ceiling above. If the door jam falls sideways you will be cut in half by the doorway. In either case, you will be killed!

7) Never go to the stairs. The stairs have a different 'moment of frequency (they swing separately from the main part of the building). The stairs and remainder of the building continuously bump into each other until structural failure of the stairs takes place. The people who get on stairs before they fail are chopped up by the stair treads? horribly mutilated. Even if the building doesn't collapse, stay away from the stairs. The stairs are a likely part of the building to be damaged. Even if the stairs are not collapsed by the earthquake, they may collapse later when overloaded by fleeing people. They should always be checked for safety, even when the rest of the building is not damaged.

8) Get Near the Outer Walls Of Buildings Or Outside Of Them If Possible - It is much better to be near the outside of the building rather than the interior. The farther inside you are from the outside perimeter of the building the greater the probability that your escape route will be blocked.

9) People inside of their vehicles are crushed when the road above falls in an earthquake and crushes their vehicles; which is exactly what happened with the slabs between the decks of the Nimitz Freeway. The victims of the San Francisco earthquake all stayed inside of their vehicles. They were all killed. They could have easily survived by getting out and lying in the fetal position next to their vehicles. Everyone killed would have survived if they had been able to get out of their cars and sit or lie next to them. All the crushed cars had voids 3 feet high next to them, except for the cars that had columns fall directly across them.


10) I discovered, while crawling inside of collapsed newspaper offices and other offices with a lot of paper, that paper does not compact. Large voids are found surrounding stacks of paper.

In 1996 we made a film, which proved my survival methodology to be correct. The Turkish Federal Government, City of Istanbul , University of Istanbul Case Productions and ARTI cooperated to film this practical, scientific test. We collapsed a school and a home with 20 mannequins inside. Ten mannequins did 'duck and cover,' and ten mannequins I used in my 'triangle of life' survival method. After the simulated earthquake collapse we crawled through the rubble and entered the building to film and document the results.

The film, in which I practiced my survival techniques under directly observable, scientific conditions, relevant to building collapse, showed there would have been zero percent survival for those doing duck and cover.

There would likely have been 100 percent survivability for people using my method of the 'triangle of life.' This film has been seen by millions of viewers on television in Turkey and the rest of Europe , and it was seen in the USA , Canada and Latin America on the TV program Real TV.

Spread the word and save someone's life... The entire world is experiencing natural calamities so be prepared!
©

Why Strategy Matters

Sometimes it seems that Direct Marketers plan a new business every day.

Whether our plans have a thousand pages or five pages, they start with the same four elements: Background, Objective, Strategy, Tactics.

The Background is the answer to “Why are we doing this?” It contains every bit of information relevant to your task.
Why Isn't Everyone An Entrepreneur? Lois Geller Lois Geller Contributor
Why A Brand Matters Lois Geller Lois Geller Contributor
Headlines And Titles Are Not The Same Thing Lois Geller Lois Geller Contributor

The Objective is a simple statement. You can’t have more than one Objective. It answers the question “What are we trying to achieve?” It can’t be vague. It has to be as specific as you can make it. This frightens some people.
NO: Sell as many widgets as we can
YES: Sell 50,000 widgets @$38 by Q4, 2013

Each stage should be consistent with the previous stages. For instance, if you sold only 500 widgets last year, you probably won’t sell 50,000 this year unless there’s something really spectacular in the Background.

Then comes the hard part: Strategy

A lot of people have a hard time distinguishing between Strategy and Tactics. That’s partly because Tactics are fun and easy while Strategy is no fun and hard.

The short version of the difference is that Strategy is what Generals do; Tactics are what Captains and Lieutenants do.

Usually you have only one straightforward strategic statement unless your Objective is complicated. (I’d de-complicate it before doing anything else.)
You can have as many tactical statements as you want as long as they’re consistent with Background/Objective/Strategy.

When I taught Direct Marketing at NYU, our Creative Director came up with an oddball analogy to make the Strategy/Tactics difference come alive:

The Trojan Horse

He’d start by telling the students that the Trojan Horse, famous as it is, was merely a Tactic.

The story’s probably mythical. The Trojan War started 3,200 or so years ago when drop-dead gorgeous Helen, the one with the face that launched a thousand ships, ran off with a guy named Paris. This would have been okay except that Helen was married to a Greek -
Menelaus, King of Sparta.
Menelaus got his brother, Agamemnon, to take an army and follow Helen and Paris to Paris’s hometown of Troy, not all that far away in western Turkey. The Greeks laid siege to the city for 10 long years but Troy was impregnable.

At first, the Objective was “Get Helen back now”

Then it became “Take Troy and maybe get Helen back.” The siege strategy wasn’t working
so they had a meeting. Everything they’d done up to that point was Background. They reviewed it and decided they needed a new Strategy. This happens in business all the time. In the military, too.

I’ve always imagined a brainstorming session around a campfire until somebody, probably Ulysses, came up with an idea: “If we can’t get the gates open from the outside, maybe we can get them open from the inside without the Trojans knowing.” Aha!

At this point, as everything focused on the new Strategy, we see the trickledown theory of planning: your boss’s Strategy becomes your Objective.

Maybe they tried different tactics: bribery, sneaking in, swimming through sewers or just tossing volunteers over the wall. Nothing worked. That didn’t mean the Strategy was wrong. It just meant they needed a new tactical idea.

Finally, Ulysses came up with the elaborate notion of a hollow horse with soldiers, including Ulysses himself, hiding inside. The plan included the window dressing of pretending to sail away and leaving behind a soldier (named Sinon). His job was to tell the Trojans that the Greeks had gone home leaving this giant horse as a gift to the Goddess Athena. Sinon said the horse was made so big in order to keep the Trojans from taking it into the city. Ah, human nature.

You know what happened next. Despite warnings from wiser heads, the Trojans dragged the horse into the city and partied hearty. Meanwhile, the Greek army came back, the soldiers hidden in the horse came out and opened the gates. The Trojans were slaughtered.

The Greeks won, thanks to a solid Strategy.

And the tricky Tactic got all the credit.

What is your strategy (the BIG idea)? Please Comment below.
©

June 14, 2012

X-Files Wiki

Welcome to The X-Files Wiki

This site is a reference guide to The X-Files television series, related series Millennium and The Lone Gunmen, as well as The X-Files Movie and the latest movie, The X-Files: I Want to Believe. Anyone can edit these pages, so come and enjoy building this site! The truth is in here, this is who we are!

This site was started in July 2005 and currently includes 2,138 articles.

The X-Files

Main Characters: Recurring Characters:

The X-Files Seasons

1: EpisodesDVDs
2: EpisodesDVDs
3: EpisodesDVDs
4: EpisodesDVDs
5: EpisodesDVDs
6: EpisodesDVDs
7: EpisodesDVDs
8: EpisodesDVDs
9: EpisodesDVDs
The X-Files Movie: DVD
The X-Files: I Want to Believe


The X-Files Mythology The X-Files Video Games
Millennium

Main Characters: Recurring Characters:

Millennium Seasons:

1: EpisodesDVDs
2: EpisodesDVDs
3: EpisodesDVDs
Complete Series DVD
"Millennium"

The Lone Gunmen

Main Characters: Recurring Characters:

The Lone Gunmen Seasons:

1: EpisodesDVDs
"Jump the Shark"

©

June 11, 2012

Santana - Put Your Lights On

by Everlast

Hey now, all you sinners
Put your lights on, put your lights on
Hey now, all you lovers
Put your lights on, put your lights on

Hey now, all you killers
Put your lights on, put your lights on
Hey now, all you children
Leave your lights on, you better leave your lights on

Cause there's a monster living under my bed
Whispering in my ear
There's an angel, with a hand on my head
She say I've got nothing to fear

There's a darkness living deep in my soul
I still got a purpose to serve
So let your light shine, deep into my home
God, don't let me lose my nerve
Don't let me lose my nerve

Hey now, hey now, hey now, hey now
Wo oh hey now, hey now, hey now, hey now

Hey now, all you sinners
Put your lights on, put your lights on
Hey now, all you children
Leave your lights on, you better leave your lights on

Because there's a monster living under my bed
Whispering in my ear
There's an angel, with a hand on my head
She say's I've got nothing to fear
She says: La illaha illa Allah
We all shine like stars
She says: La illaha illa Allah
We all shine like stars
Then we fade away
©

June 8, 2012

Д.Сяопин о внешней политике Китая

Д. Сяопин о внешней политике Китая

Всем известна крылатая фраза Д.Сяопина о кошке. А мне нравится его высказывание о стратегии во внешней политике КНР, которое до сих пор остается актуальным.

«Наблюдайте хладнокровно; берегите наше положение; спокойно занимайтесь делами; не показывайте свои возможности и ожидайте подходящего момента; никогда не пытайтесь забежать вперед и никогда не покушайтесь на лидерство».
©

June 5, 2012

Татьяна Толстая: Я со странною любовью отношусь к русскому народу

Познер - Первый канал

В.ПОЗНЕР: Почему уезжают в таком количестве?

Т.ТОЛСТАЯ: Во-первых, легко уехать. Во-вторых, дальние страны вообще манят. Ну и надоедает то угрюмое хамство, которым здесь наша жизнь, все же, пропитана. Не все это любят.
...

В.ПОЗНЕР: Скажите, пожалуйста, поскольку время бежит, а у меня
миллион к вам вопросов еще… Как-то вы высказались в том духе, что 
запретить мат смешно – это все равно, что как запретить соль и перец, и
что представление о том, что интеллигентный не может материться – это
глупость.


Т.ТОЛСТАЯ: Да. Так я думаю, да. Интеллигент другим определяется.
Системой ценностей и способностью к критике, и к самокритике в первую
очередь.

...

В.ПОЗНЕР: Оказавшись перед Богом, что вы ему скажете?


Т.ТОЛСТАЯ: "Покажи еще".

©

PHD Comics: Play

June 3, 2012

Познер - Михаил Жванецкий

Первый канал

В.ПОЗНЕР: Ты что-то сказал где-то, что ты рабочих потерял, что рабочих больше нет.

М.ЖВАНЕЦКИЙ: Нет. Я сказал где-то, что мне не хватает... И всем нам не хватает не рабочих – не хватает инженеров, не хватает ученых молодых.Это были мало оплачиваемые советские люди, но очень умные.

В.ПОЗНЕР: Которые уехали многие?

М.ЖВАНЕЦКИЙ: Которые уехали. Огромное количество уехало. Но они заполняли зал.

В.ПОЗНЕР: Они уехали за деньгами что ли?

М.ЖВАНЕЦКИЙ: А почему бы им не уехать за деньгами? Во-первых, они уехали за деньгами – раз. Во-вторых, они уехали за хорошим оборудованием – два. В-третьих, они уехали за огромным уважением – три. В-четвертых, они уехали туда, куда уже уехали многие. А это ж всегда вопрос стадный. В.ПОЗНЕР: Хорошо. Это уехали "за". А уехали "от"? От чего уехали? У тебя есть на это ответ?

М.ЖВАНЕЦКИЙ: Есть на это ответ. От жлобства. Не от нищеты, не от еды. Во-первых, им никто не сказал: "Оставайтесь". Ты видел где-нибудь страну, где никто бы не сказал "оставайтесь"? Где никто бы не сказал "подождите"? Где никто бы не сказал "подумайте"? Где никто бы не сказал: "Давайте мы туда пошлем кого-нибудь. Давайте мы вам привезем какой-нибудь фильм о жизни там, давайте мы покажем. Вы сумеете, вот лично вы там приспособиться? Или вам будет тяжело?" "Уезжайте" - это педагогически. Мол, наши так себя вели как хорошие педагоги: "Ты хочешь? Уезжай, и черт с тобой". И вот уезжали люди не за колбасой, они уезжали от жлобства. Слово "жлоб" - это примерно слово "хам".

В.ПОЗНЕР: А чего ты не уехал от жлобства?

М.ЖВАНЕЦКИЙ: Ты понимаешь, самое главное – черт с ним, с голодом. Но жлобство, когда тебе говорят в лицо или не берут из-за национальности, или ты... Знаешь, каждое предприятие, каждое учреждение – суд, райком партии – суд, при ЖЭКе – суд. Куда бы ты ни попал, всюду тебя судят. Вот от этого люди уезжают – невозможно было вынести.

В.ПОЗНЕР: Но ты-то не уехал от жлобства?

М.ЖВАНЕЦКИЙ: Нет. Я не уехал, потому что для меня этого было мало. Жлобство – этого было мало, чтобы я расстался со своей страной. Меня здесь слишком много связывает: меня великая литература связывает, я здесь почувствовал успех, я почувствовал вот эту огромную связь. Ты знаешь, я где-то писал, что я обожаю не веревки, а нити. Вот веревки, которые меня связывали с этой родиной – черт с ними. Но нити у меня были сильнее. И уехала женщина, которую я любил очень, и говорила: "Уедем вместе. Я не могу в этой стране жить. Я не могу слышать их, я не могу видеть, я не могу это радио слышать. Я не могу жить здесь, я не могу людей даже видеть, которые слушают это радио". А меня здесь запрещали, а я - все равно, я остался здесь. Ты представляешь? Она уехала, я остался. Остался здесь, в этой стране, где меня запрещали, пожертвовав всем. Ну вот, объяснить это... Наверное, объяснил – потому что нити были гораздо сильнее, чем веревки.
©

Из Жванецкого. О Конституции.


Это сильнее Чехова и Достоевского, это не то, с чего можно брать пример. Это можно потребовать для себя, лично. Дадут или не дадут – не скажу, но требовать обязаны. Художественным произведением вы можете восторгаться, наслаждаться, любоваться и даже питаться, но не можете требовать его для себя. А когда вы слышите то, что вам обязаны предоставить – потому что вы есть, не хуже всех, не хуже других, не хуже любого и, что самое главное, не лучше другого – вы можете требовать для себя то, что там есть. Там все для вас.

К тому, что в Библии, надо стремиться - очищаться, улучшаться. И вы всегда в начале пути, когда бы вы ни открыли и в каком бы месте. Для Библии вы должны измениться. Для Конституции – нет, нет, нет. Она дает все такому, какой вы есть, здесь и сейчас. Она просто внезапно говорит вам, что вы – человек, исходя из чего вы обязаны и вам обязаны. И исходя из чего вы можете не только думать, но и говорить, высказывать свое. И вас не касается, совпадает это ваше с не вашим, с общим, с соседским, с принятым, даже с полезным или приятным. Вас не касается. Вы – свободны, одиноки, вы мыслите и говорите.

Вокруг вас - довольно плотно к телу - то, что называется вашей свободой. Ваша свобода может касаться, но не пересекаться со свободой другого человека, во всем равного вам. У него может быть скверный характер, он может быть черен, немыт и безног – он во всем равен вам. Все остальное – обслуга. Ваша обслуга – это власть, полиция, милиция, таможня, медицина, дорога, стройка, армия – все это сервис, не власть. Власть – это вы, я, он, миллионы я, я, я, я, собранные в голоса населения. Два-три мнения, где большинство есть глас Божий.

Ваш одинокий, независимый голос плюс мой, плюс Ларисы, плюс Тани, плюс отца, плюс, плюс – голоса складываются и раскладываются. В Думе – наши голоса. Как они выглядят - так они выглядят. Это мы, собранные в пучок.

Президент, собранный из нас, которому внятно сказано нами в большинстве своем: "Мы хотим, чтобы ты был первым". Это не значит, что ты лучший. Мы выбрали из тех, кто поднял руку, из тех, кто предложил себя. Ты – первый на четыре года. Если пригодишься народу своему, будешь еще четыре года – больше нельзя. Ты начнешь нас угнетать, сам того не желая. Власть перестанет быть обслугой, а станет властью, обязательной. Весь мир отверг этот соблазн. Дай себя сменить. На другого человека. Пусть он будет хуже – он принесет главное: уверенность во власти народа, состоящего из мыслящих существ. Народ убедить легко. Каждого из нас – очень сложно. Смена власти – желание каждого из нас. Для того чтобы над всем – выше Библии, выше религии, выше здоровья – была эта книга, Конституция нашей страны".
©